St. Charles, the third oldest city in Missouri, was settled in 1769. It is located on the west bank of the Missouri River as it curves north to join the Mississippi River. The city was independent of St. Louis and its suburbs until the 1950s, when it became part of the outer ring of St. Louis, following rapid suburban expansion.
During the first year of its 5-year strategic plan, St. Charles will spend $456,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds on 18 projects designed to improve the city's housing stock, infrastructure, and public facilities.
To encourage community participation, public hearings were held in each
CDBG-eligible area early in the Consolidated Plan development process. Notices
of the hearings were published in three local newspapers and posted in local
libraries, post offices, and other public facilities. Each hearing opened with a
request to the audience for a listing of community strengths and needs. A 30-day
public comment period on the draft plan in May 1995 was announced in posted and
published notices that included a list of the proposed projects.
After five decades of rapid growth, St. Charles had a population of 54,555 in 1990. Its population increased by 17,176 during the 1980s. This rapid increase was due to expanding city boundaries and the subsequent construction of new single-family and multifamily housing units. However, such rapid growth is unlikely to continue because areas to the north and northwest are flood plains of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers and the city of St. Peters is on the south and west. Little open space for substantial residential development remains.
In 1990 there were 21,677 households in St. Charles. Of those, 7 percent were extremely low-income (0-30 percent of median family income (MFI) in the St. Louis metropolitan area); 8 percent were very low-income households (31-50 percent of MFI); 17 percent were low- income households (51-80 percent of MFI); and ten percent were moderate-income households (81-95 percent of MFI). Together, these groups are targeted for low- and moderate-income benefits of the CDBG program.
More than 95 percent of the population is white, although the percentage of
minorities increased from 2.8 percent in 1980 to 4.2 percent in 1990. Minorities
are generally dispersed throughout the city.
With the Mississippi River to the northwest and the Missouri River along its eastern boundary, St. Charles was affected during the Midwestern flood of 1993. Although only small areas of the city were damaged by the flood, the majority of residents in these areas had low and moderate incomes. The flood dramatically reduced affordable housing options available to lower income renters by eliminating many mobile home units and substantially damaging many homes in northern St. Charles. With the flooding of many substandard structures, the city seized the opportunity to acquire properties in the floodway and the 100-year flood plain. For the most part, residents have relocated to areas deemed safe from future flooding.
Feedback at neighborhood meetings led to the conclusion that the community's most important housing need is the preservation and maintenance of existing structures.
St. Charles plans to expand homeownership opportunities for minority residents. During the past 5 years only one minority homeowner participated in the Home Improvement Loan Program. The city will increase outreach activities to the minority community to encourage minority participation in the program.
In 1990 there were 23,246 housing units in the city of St. Charles, of which 8,733 (38 percent) were renter-occupied and 12,937 (56 percent) were owner-occupied. During the building boom in the 1980s, the number of rental units more than doubled, from 4,454 to 9,809. The majority of these new rental units were located in large apartment complexes with between 100 and 700 units, mostly targeted at the two-bedroom market. The estimated vacancy rate for rental units was 11 percent in 1990, but only 1 percent for owner-occupied units for sale. The high rental vacancy rate reflects the economic slowdown of the late 1980s, which created a surplus of rental units.
The flood of 1993 effectively wiped out any housing vacancies remaining in the city, particularly for lower income households. Rental units became very difficult to find. With the permanent relocation of most of the flood victims, the housing crunch has eased overall, although low-income households continue to have problems finding affordable units. Two larger mobile home parks in the flood area were purchased by St. Charles County for open space. Those parks were home to many low-income households.
In the city of St. Charles in 1990, 82 percent of extremely low-income households were burdened with housing costs above 30 percent of their income, and 65 percent paid more than 50 percent. While 47 percent of owners had housing problems, 96 percent of renters had housing problems related to cost, crowding, or substandard structures.
Incidence of housing problems, usually related to cost burden, dropped rapidly with increasing income. Only 14 percent of moderate-income households had housing problems.
St. Charles has used its own definition of substandard housing as related to the housing codes. The city estimates that 16 percent of rental units are substandard, most suitable for rehabilitation. Units built before 1950 were most likely to be considered substandard.
The Salvation Army provided shelter for 456 individuals in 1990, but an additional 1,414 persons were turned away due to lack of facilities. Three facilities in St. Charles provide shelter and services to the homeless:
In addition to the homeless population, other families and individuals are at risk of becoming homeless, including extremely cost-burdened, very low-income households and persons. In 1990, 803 renter households and 255 owner households in St. Charles fell into this category.
The St. Charles Housing Authority operates 58 public housing units. Of these, 12 are one- bedroom units, 21 are two-bedroom units, and 25 are three-bedroom units. All 58 units are in the process of substantial rehabilitation, and three of the units are being renovated to become accessible to disabled persons.
In an effort to improve the quantity and quality of its public housing stock, St. Charles plans to build 14 Family Self-Sufficient units throughout the city. Rental assistance for these units will be available through Section 8 certificates.
The city reports that zoning regulations, the permit process, and building codes do not negatively affect the ability of developers to construct affordable housing. However, land available for development is now quite limited.
Because of its small minority population, St. Charles focuses on economic rather than racial diversity in its fair housing policies. As part of the Consolidated Plan, the city will continue to develop strategies that promote diversity in the size and affordability of housing in every section of the city.
Although the State Health Department, County Health Department nurses, and St. Joseph Health Center Laboratory have no recorded incidence of lead poisoning, it is probable that lead-based paint poisoning does occur because of the age of housing in the city. It is estimated that 2,776 very low- and low-income households reside in housing with lead- based paint hazard potential.
St. Charles needs additional recreational activities for its growing community, particularly in the vicinity of new residential development south of I-70. Boonslick Park, a park in an older low- to moderate-income area, needs upgrading to provide additional activities and to improve security. The creek in the park will be enclosed in a storm sewer to reduce erosion. The Senior Center needs more parking.
The infrastructure -- particularly streets and sewers -- in the older areas of St. Charles continues to need upgrading, reconstructing, and improving. Code enforcement needs to be strengthened.
Certain groups of people need services to help them be productive members of
the community and to cope with daily living. These include senior citizens,
handicapped persons, disadvantaged youth, low-income parents of infants and
children, and homeless persons or those at risk of homelessness.
The Consolidated Plan for St. Charles lists a number of long-range housing and community development objectives, including:
St. Charles has four priorities for improving and expanding its housing stock:
In its 5-year plan, St. Charles identifies long-term community development strategies to improve the following public facilities and services:
The city aims to upgrade two public parks, Boonslick and West Winds, adding activities and security. These parks are located in lower income neighborhoods with limited community activities. St. Charles is also strongly committed to maintaining and expanding its social services programs for populations with special needs, including disadvantaged youth, senior citizens, disabled persons, and low-income families.
The Consolidated Plan emphasizes the need to reduce the number of residents in poverty by helping people find jobs and increase job skills.
In addition to CDBG funds, the city plans to use funds from the Federal Emergency Shelter Grant, public housing, and Section 202 housing for the elderly.
The St. Charles Department of City Development was the lead agency in
preparing the Consolidated Plan. Over the course of the plan term, city staff
will continue to meet with members of the community and representatives of
social services agencies to discuss housing and community development issues and
concerns.
During the coming year, St. Charles will spend $456,000 in CDBG funds for 18 housing, infrastructure, and social services activities, including:
MAP 2 depicts points of interest and low-moderate income areas.
MAP 3 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, and minority concentration levels.
MAP 4 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, and unemployment levels.
MAP 5 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, unemployment levels, and proposed HUD funded projects.
MAP 6 is a map, sectioned by neighborhood, which depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, unemployment levels, and proposed HUD funded projects.
MAP 7 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, unemployment levels, and proposed HUD funded projects within one of the four neighborhoods indicated in MAP 6.
MAP 8 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, unemployment levels, and proposed HUD funded projects within another of the four neighborhoods indicated in MAP 6.
MAP 9 depicts points of interest, low-moderate income areas, unemployment levels, and proposed HUD funded project(s) from a street level vantage point; in addition, a table provides information about the project(s).