General and Special Risk Insurance Account

GENERAL AND SPECIAL RISK INSURANCE ACCOUNT

PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

NA=NOT APPLICABLE

 

SUMMARY OF BUDGET REQUESTS

A.Credit Limitation. A limitation on new insurance commitments for fiscal year 2000 of $18.1 billion is requested. It is estimated that $5 billion in insurance will be written for multifamily and healthcare related products in fiscal year 2000 for 110,621 units. Another $1 billion is estimated in hospital mortgage insurance. Single family and Title 1 endorsements are projected $10.1 billion in fiscal year 2000 for an estimated 166,537 units.

A direct loan limitation of $50 million is requested. Of this amount, $30 million is intended for bridge loan financing to facilitate the sale of multifamily projects, and $20 million is for 5-year purchase money mortgages for non-profit and governmental agencies to make HUD-acquired single family properties available for resale to purchasers at or below 115 percent of area median incomes

B.Appropriations. The fiscal year 2000 request includes up to $153 million in appropriations for credit subsidy necessary for reservations related to various multifamily and hospital loan programs in the GI/SRI program account. For the GI/SRI administrative expense transfer up to $211 million is requested, of which $193 million is for transfer to the Departmental Salaries and Expense Account and $18 million is for the Office of Inspector General.

The appropriations sought for credit subsidy and administrative expenses are partially funded by carryover balances available for these purposes, reducing the need for new appropriations in 2000. Under the proposed language, it is estimated that $300 million will be available from this source.

The $153 million of credit subsidy represents the net present value of the expected costs to the Government of insurance commitments of $2.1 billion in fiscal year 2000 in those multifamily and other program categories where costs are projected to exceed fee and premium income over the duration of the loans.

For 2000, a new appropriation of $144 million is requested for administrative contract expenses that heretofore have been paid directly from the Fund. In addition, up to $14.4 million more may be made available for these expenses if loan commitment activity in the first 6 months of the fiscal year exceeds the seasonally adjusted rate of commitments for that period based on the annual estimate for such commitments. This new appropriation for contract expenses is offset by a proposal to amend the National Housing Act to terminate the existing authority which permits these costs to be paid directly from the Fund. This provision is estimated to yield savings of $151 million, more than offsetting the cost of the appropriations requested for administrative contract expenses.

The fiscal year 2000 request also includes estimated commitments of $14.4 billion in products where the present value of projected revenues from new insurance exceeds the present value of estimated costs, resulting in the generation of negative credit subsidy. Negative credit subsidy of $77 million from new insurance is the estimate for fiscal year 2000 which will be a discretionary offset against the total budget authority and outlays of the Department.

During fiscal year 1998, the Department sought and received an additional $40 million for the upsurge in multifamily and hospital reservations. The increase in the demand for FHA products was an unexpected result of a more stable and prosperous national economy than predicted. The resulting lower interest rates tended to shift the demand for multifamily business away from the 223(f) rehabilitation programs and created more demand for the 221(d)4) new construction/substantial rehabilitation products. This increase in new construction/substantial rehabilitation activity required an additional amount of positive subsidy that was not budgeted for.

Remaining balances will be transferred from the liquidating account to Treasury at the end of fiscal year 1999. In 2000, additional mandatory permanent budget authority estimated at $1.2 billion will be drawn down to the liquidating account. It addition, $46 million in mandatory authority to borrow is estimated to be used to pay for claims with debentures.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

A.GI/SRI Insurance Products. The Department will continue to offer a range of alternative products to address specialized mortgage finance needs. These products include insurance for mortgages for rehabilitation, development, and refinancing of apartment buildings; hospitals; assisted living and nursing home facilities, and Title I loans. The Department will work to expand the use of new products that were introduced in fiscal year 1997. These new products will enhance the ability of for-profit and nonprofit developers to develop and rehabilitate affordable housing. The Department's insurance products will continue to meet the Nation's need for decent, safe and affordable housing. In addition, its multifamily products are consistent with the President's agenda of moving people from welfare to work and the targeted community rebuilding efforts.

B.Hospital Programs. The Department will continue the Section 242 Program, which provides mortgage insurance for loans made for construction, renovation and/or equipping of acute care hospitals. Since the program began in 1968, FHA has insured approximately 300 hospital mortgages totaling in excess of $8.6 billion. The Hospital Mortgage Insurance Program also includes: Section 241 supplemental loans; Section 223(a)(7) loans for refinancing existing insured projects; and Section 223(e) loans for hospitals in older, declining urban areas. The Hospital Mortgage Insurance Program is administered by HUD Headquarters, with support from staff at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

C.Multifamily Credit Subsidy Rates. Over the past 2 years, the Department has devoted significant efforts to developing realistic credit subsidy estimates. The credit subsidy estimates were developed after extensive consultation with OMB by FHA and reflect substantial additional analysis by the Department. The Department has focused on the major factors indicating how loans will perform. These "critical" loan performance assumptions are:

    1. Historical Performance Experience;
    2. Claim Rates and Prepayment Rates;
    3. Claim Ratios; and
    4. Loss Recovery Rates

The analyses used historical loan data for program assumptions but did not solely rely upon past performance. The analyses incorporated the recovery rate results of the initial mortgage sales program along with the recovery rates from the property disposition program. Where historical data was not available on claims and prepayments, particularly for some of the new products, a conservative approach that resulted in higher credit subsidy estimates was used.

D. Title I Program Subsidy Rates. The fiscal year 2000 estimates for the Title I Programs reflect revised cash-flow assumptions. FHA has recently analyzed the loan characteristics of the property improvement and the manufactured housing program and incorporated the results into the cash-flows which are used to calculate the subsidy rate for loan programs in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990. The change in rates primarily reflects higher claim rates than previously assumed, offset by program reforms to reduce subsidy costs.

E.Title II Program Single-Family Subsidy Rates. The GI/SRI single-family credit subsidy estimates also reflect the results of a recent review of loan performance since the original actuarial study which was conducted in 1992. The new analysis updated loan performance data and assumptions of the major GI/SRI single family programs that are currently active. Those mortgage insurance programs are: 234(c) Condominium Housing; 203(k) Purchase/Rehabilitation; and 221(d)(2) Homeownership Assistance. On the basis of this analysis FHA is proposing to discontinue the 221(d)(2) program because of high claim rates, low volumes, and the availability of alternative financing. FHA is also proposing to make premium and program changes which will result in slightly negative subsidy rates for the 234(c) and 203(k) programs.

The following table displays the estimated allocation of commitment authority and subsidy by program for fiscal year 2000.

GI/SRI PROGRAMS

COMMITMENT AUTHORITY

FY 2000

SUBSIDY RATE

FY 2000

POSITIVE SUBSIDY BA FY 2000

Apartments NC/SC

$1,878,493,231

7.12%

$133,690,104

               

221 d3 NP coop owned apts.

$82,496,480

15.44%

$12,737,457

               

Tax Credit Projects

$101,959,965

-0.57%

                 

Mixed Income d4 (HOPE VI)

$10,495,855

11.81%

$1,239,560

               
                       

Apartments Refinance

$885,789,420

-1.34%

241a Supplemental loans for Apts.

$21,491,620

13.88%

$2,983,037

Operating Loss Loans for Apts

$1,490,040

25.10%

$374,000

               

HFA Risksharing

$660,267,704

-0.45%

                 

GSE Risksharing

$883,390,868

-1.88%

                 
                       

FHA Full Insurance for Health Care Facilities

$408,987,451

-2.79%

                 

Health Care Refinance

$309,000,000

-1.90%

                 

232 Operating Loss Loans

$5,496,000

25.10%

$1,379,496

               
                       

Hospitals

$1,030,000,000

-1.60%

                 

Multifamily & Healthcare Subtotal

$6,279,358,634

 

$152,403,654

               
                       

Single Family Programs

                     

Title I

                     

Property Improvements

$1,015,000,000

-0.06%

                 

Manufactured Housing

$15,000,000

0.75%

$112,500

               
 

$1,030,000,000

                   

Title II

                     

234 Condominium Housing

$7,900,000,000

-0.07%

                 

203 (k) Rehabilitation Mortgage

$1,300,000,000

-0.08%

                 

$9,200,000,000

Standby Authority

$1,590,641,366

                   
                       

GI/SRI TOTAL

$18,100,000,000

 

$152,516,154

               

F. FHA Multifamily Portfolio Reengineering. The Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 was enacted in the 1998 Appropriations Act. The permanent program takes effect in fiscal year 1999, with transition provisions for project-based Section 8 contracts that expired during fiscal year 1998. The pending expiration of over-subsidized Section 8 contracts at unsustainable rent levels in many FHA-insured housing projects has been a dominant factor in recent FHA budget projections, and the enactment of this legislation clarified the outlook for FHA activities and costs. Separate justifications for the Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance Restructuring discuss the current expectations for the mark-to-market program. Estimates of FHA liquidating account costs associated with mark-to-market in the 2000 Budget have been scaled back relative to previous estimates. The timing of FHA costs has been phased-in more gradually between 1999 and the sunset date of the program in 2001. In addition, the scope of the mortgage restructuring program has been reduced, based on information on changes in market rents that indicate a lower proportion of the FHA-insured portfolio that indicate has above market rents, than was the case when the original survey was performed. Further study is being given this year to the comparison of current rents in FHA-insured projects to comparable market rents. It is assumed that a fraction of the projects with Section 8 contracts expiring after 2001 will elect to participate in mortgage restructuring before the sunset date of the legislation.

G. Mortgage Note Sales. There were no note sales in fiscal year 1998, however sales are expected to resume late in fiscal year 1999, and pick up in 2000. Ongoing note sale activity in the future will be driven by the amount of salable notes entering the inventory. Currently a large proportion of the remaining multifamily notes are subsidized. The Department is continuing to review its options for marketing the subsidized inventory. With 5 years of successful sales, at the end of 1998 the inventory of multifamily and single family notes is at a recent historic low level. While the portfolio reengineering legislation remains in effect, the need for mortgage sales in connection with potential claims for subsidized projects with above market rents will be minimized. Nevertheless, the Department is committed to maintaining an efficient and cost-effective operation and will continue to monitor the impact that results from our aggressive servicing and portfolio restructuring activities to insure that the inventory of HUD-held mortgages does not grow to unmanageable levels.

H. HUD 2020. During fiscal year 1998, FHA engaged in a full-scale reorganization of its operating structure in response to HUD 2020 as laid out by the Secretary. This reorganization resulted in a redirecting of personnel to areas of greatest need, streamlining and consolidating operations. Fiscal year 1998 was primarily geared toward: (1) reformulating FHA mission; (2) scrutinizing and streamlining functions; and (3) expanding training efforts and shifting personnel resources.

I. Multifamily Enforcement. The multifamily enforcement strategy will continue to be integrated with the overall Department efforts through the establishment of the Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) and the Departmental Enforcement Center (DEC). The REAC will assure that uniform portfolio wide information on the physical and financial condition of all the properties is obtained. Results will be forwarded to Housing's Multifamily Hubs for additional actions. The Multifamily Hubs are responsible for servicing the loans and overseeing subsidy contracts. In those cases where there appear to be severe performance problems, the case will be sent to the DEC. The DEC will evaluate each case it receives and, where the DEC decides that severe problems exist, the DEC will provide an action plan to be implemented by the Hubs to address the problem(s). The Department expects qualitative improvement in the assessment and enforcement effort through the centralization and specialization of these staff. The ultimate goal however, is improved living conditions for residents, improved neighborhoods and communities, and improved financial performance for FHA because performance standards for participants are raised.

J. Performance Indicators. The strategic objectives established for the Department are to: (1) increase the availability of affordable housing in standard condition to the nation's poor and disadvantaged; (2) provide empowerment and self-sufficiency opportunities to low-income individuals and families as they make the transition from dependency to work; and (3) increase homeownership opportunities, especially in central cities, through a variety of tools, such as expanding access to mortgage credit.

Last year the 1999 Budget submission contained several performance measures designed to assist in accomplishing the goals set for fiscal year 1999. During fiscal year 1998 these performance measures were then refined into a Business Operating Plan to assist the field offices, Hubs and home ownership centers in working towards the strategic objectives set forth for the Department.

The first set of measures focuses on increasing the availability of affordable housing for the poor and disadvantaged by improved program delivery methods to facilitate access to financing for rental housing and health care facilities underserved by conventional mortgage markets. The following performance measures are geared towards accomplishing this objective.

1. The 223(f) refinancing program for healthcare and multifamily buildings will be enhanced. The Department plans to use innovative ways to reduce the processing time for providing service to our clients by increased use of the FASTTRACK method of endorsing loans. The use of these methods assures that the Department's insurance program will be attractive to customers and generate increased demand.

2. The Department also plans to increase the proportion of units in multifamily rental projects insured by FHA that are affordable to households with incomes below 60 percent of area median income.

3. A performance measure is directed towards providing empowerment and self-sufficiency opportunities as individuals and families transition from welfare to work. To assist in this objective the Department will assure that the business plans for the Neighborhood Network Centers include objectives, milestones and timetables that work towards supporting low-income individuals and families during their transition period into the workforce, so that measures of the impact on residents that use these Centers can be developed.

4. The final set of performance measures is directed at attaining the objective of increasing homeownership opportunities in central cities through a variety of tools such as expanding the access to mortgage credit. The Department has set an agency wide goal to increase the overall rate of homeownership to 67.5 percent in the year 2000 and increase the home ownership rate in Central Cities to 52.5 percent by that same year.

5. The Department plans to assist in stabilizing older urban neighborhoods by revamping the 203(k) and Title 1 property improvement loan programs to rehabilitate more single family properties.

CHANGES FROM 1998 ESTIMATES INCLUDED IN 1999 BUDGET

Commitments and Mortgage Origination

Insurance was endorsed for $9.7 billion in mortgages for 111,167 single family units and $4.3 billion for 97,123 multifamily units during fiscal year 1998. These insurance written numbers represent commitments made from fiscal years 1997 through 1998.

B. CHANGES IN 1999 ESTIMATES FROM 1999 BUDGET

Commitment and Mortgage Origination

The enacted commitment limitation is $18.1 billion for 1999. This will support initiatives such as development, refinancing and risk sharing as well as recent product introductions such as mixed income, pool insurance and insurance for very small buildings (5-20 units). During fiscal year 1999, mortgage insurance-written is expected to increase slightly to $17.2 billion, compared to the estimate of $17.0 billion in the 1999 Budget. Insurance-written numbers represent estimated commitment activities from fiscal years 1998 and 1999. Single family commitments in 1999 are exceeding the strong pace maintained during fiscal year 1998, after the decline in interest rates. The flurry of refinancing activity is estimated to finally play itself out by 2000.

 
Content Archived: January 20, 2009