 |
2000 Best Practices
Selection Process
Executive Committee
Overview of Executive Committee
Roles and Responsibilities
Overview of Best Practices Criteria
Best Practice Criteria:
Demonstrated a Positive Impact on those Served
Best Practice Criteria:
Able to Be Replicated in Other Areas through a Clear
Methodology, Tool, Program, Project or Model
Best Practice Criteria:
Exhibited Creativity in Addressing the Problem
Best Practice Criteria:
Overcame Challenges in Established Programs, Functions
or Regions
Best Practice Criteria:
Demonstrated Effective Use of Partnerships
Best Practice Criteria:
Exceeded the Expectations of HUD Customers
Overview of Executive Committee Roles and Responsibilities
- Before reviewing and selecting the Top 100
Best Practice Nominations for 2000, each member of the Executive Panel
will receive a binder with the following information:
- A summary fact sheet for each forwarded
nomination.
- A hard copy of the nomination form.
- Executive Summary of the nomination provided
by the nominee.
- BPIS Selection Process Instructions.
- Training schedule for BPIS.
- After reviewing the information provided
in the binder, each member of the Executive Panel will individually rate
and rank the nominations forwarded by the Program Offices and Secretarys
Representatives.
- Each member will electronically rate all
the nominations forwarded to them against a pre-determined and approved
set of Best Practice Criteria.
- Each Best Practice criteria will be weighted.
- Each nomination will receive a total score
and will be automatically ranked against all nominations received by the
panel.
- An optional comment/justification
field is provided for each nomination.
- After every member on the Executive Panel
completes the individual selection process, the BPIS will synthesize the
information provided and automatically produce a ranked list of the nominations
(e.g., 1 - 400).
- As a group, the Executive Panel will meet
to discuss and agree upon the above rankings.
- From this meeting a final breakdown of the
forwarded nominations will be generated.
- The Executive Panel will task one member
with making the final electronic selections by placing a checkmark next
to those that will be in the Top 100.
- A report will be generated reflecting the
Final Top 100 Best Practices and the runners-up.
Overview of Best Practices Criteria
Executive Committee Best Practice Criteria
- The Executive Committee Members may employ
the following Best Practices Criteria to evaluate, rate and rank nominations
selected for department-wide recognition:
- Demonstrated positive impact on those served.
- Able to be replicated in other areas through
a clear methodology, tool, program, project or model.
- Exhibited creativity in addressing the problem.
- Overcame challenges in established programs,
functions or regions.
- Demonstrated effective use of partnerships.
- Exceeded the expectations of HUD customers.
Best Practice Criteria: Demonstrated a
Positive Impact on those Served
- Does the Best Practice have a qualitative
or quantitative impact (examples of benefits the Best Practice created
- number of jobs created, number of dollars saved, etc.)?
- Does the Best Practice help restore the
public trust in HUD?
- Was the Best Practice achieved through clear,
reasonable expectations and the effective utilization of the resources
necessary to meet them?
- Does the Best Practice measure specific
performance?
Best Practice Criteria: Able to Be Replicated in Other Areas through a Clear
Methodology, Tool, Program, Project or Model
- Are similar resources available in other
communities?
- Has the technique employed been clearly
documented and is it replicable?
- Can the Best Practice be applied to a different
environment?
- Does the Best Practice have the ability
to be institutionalized with the Department?
- Does the Best Practice serve as a benchmark
for other projects, programs, models or techniques throughout the Department?
Best Practice Criteria: Exhibited Creativity in Addressing the Problem
- Does the Best Practice identify and abandon
outdated procedures and fundamental assumptions that underlie current operations,
ignoring what is and concentrating on what should be?
- Does the Best Practice modernize or integrate
outdated procedures within the Department with more effective procedures?
Best Practice Criteria: Overcame Challenges in Established Programs, Functions
or Regions
- Has the Best Practice overcome barriers
in an established process, creating opportunities for Department-wide success
in similar processes?
- Does the Best Practice refocus and revitalize
HUD procedures to carry out HUD missions and goals?
- Has the Best Practice overcome process or
program fragmentation and problems in organization or duplication, bringing
focus to better performing functions needed to serve the customers and
the community?
Best Practice Criteria: Demonstrated Effective Use of Partnerships
- Does the Best Practice employ the assistance
(financial, technical, etc.) of non-governmental and governmental entities
in creating the Best Practice?
- Does the Best Practice illustrate institutions,
including governments, churches,universities, etc., working together and
becoming more interdependent, more market driven and customer driven?
- Does the Best Practice empower the communities
and citizens to work towards their own solutions with the Federal Government
acting as a partner?
- Does the Best Practice help refine HUD strategic
goals, priorities and objectives based on customer feedback?
Best Practice Criteria: Exceeded the Expectations of HUD Customers
- Does the Best Practice serve as an example
of HUDs desire to meet the needs of the community?
- Can the Best Practice be held up to other
program areas, functions or regions as a standard towards which to work?
- Can the Best Practice be marketed to other
government and non-government agencies as a positive example of government
at work?
- Does the Best Practice establish performance-based
systems or procedures for HUD programs or procedures for HUD Programs,
operations and employees?
Return
to the Best Practices Menu
Content Archived: April 20, 2011
|