Home | En Español | Contact Us | A to Z 

Potential Impacts of HUD Budget Cuts on Local Communities, FY 2000

ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY TOTAL DOLLARS LOST JOB IMPACT 1 IMPACT ON HOMELESS and PERSONS WITH AIDS 2 IMPACT ON HOUSING FOR FAMILIES 3
CHANDLER 400,000 28 1 47
FLAGSTAFF 303,000 16 1 36
GILBERT 22,000 8 0 0
GLENDALE 631,000 45 2 82
MESA 877,000 79 7 104
PEORIA CITY 55,000 13 1 1
PHOENIX 4,835,000 352 74 466
SCOTTSDALE 396,000 25 1 58
TEMPE 611,000 43 2 87
TUCSON 2,890,000 174 18 322
YUMA 638,000 22 1 86
MARICOPA COUNTY 1,544,000 79 7 163
PIMA COUNTY 539,000 67 7 52
ARIZONA STATE (other areas) 6,082,000 247 29 351
TOTAL FOR STATE $19,823,000 1,197 153 1,854

1 Includes CDBG and BEDI, and assumes $2626 cost per job created--national average for CDBG entitlement communities from 94 GPR (most recent cost figure available).

2 Includes COC, ESG, and HOPWA, and assumes $1080 cost per person served for the COC portion (approx. 85% of the homeless dollars lost) (cost from '98 applications) and $284 cost per person for the ESG portion (approx. 15% of the homeless dollars lost).

3 Includes HOME, and assumes $17,520 cost per unit--average of national average for HOME rental assistance ($19,951) and HOME homeowner rehab ($15,088). Also includes Public Housing Capital and HOPE VI, and assumes $18,510 cost per unit--national average from Abt study of public housing modernization needs (as of June 1999). Includes housing voucher dollars lost, and assumes $5,700 cost per unit--national average.

Content Archived: January 20, 2009

Whitehouse.gov
FOIA Privacy Web Policies and Important Links [logo: Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity]
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
451 7th Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20410
Telephone: (202) 708-1112 TTY: (202) 708-1455
usa.gov